|
| |
Happy Days
Some thoughts on the ongoing economic collapse
One of my readers dropped me a line in the wake of my piece,
“The Bloodletting,” saying, “Seems like somebody should write about what the
implications of the Wall Street debacle may have relative to the privatization
of Social Security, which I understand McCain & Co. are still advocating. It's
not popular and thus hasn't been on the top rung, but it's pretty clear it's
still on their agenda....”
Back when the push to privatize Social Security was in full swing, a favorite
gimmick of right wingers was to post tables showing rates of return on various
investments. The dates of the investments, like the stocks themselves, were
usually cherry-picked to produce optimum results . If you had bought 5,000
shares in Microsoft in 1980 you would own Canada and several of the outer
planets by now. Instead of getting a boring old check in the mail every month
that never had any surprises. Those tables assumed that someone would know
exactly what stocks to pick, and when to pick them, and wouldn’t charge you a
dime for that service.
Such calculations had a way of making those government checks look pretty puny.
Now, if you had taken your life savings and all the money that was deducted from
your checks over the years for Social Security, and let Lehman Brothers manage
it, you would be looking at a rosy future in which you could reenter the
workforce at the age of 85 and hope for a part time job as a greeter at Walmart.
My reader probably surmised correctly that Republicans would continue to push
for privatizing Social Security despite all this, and there’s a dirty little
secret there: they aren’t interested in privatizing Social Security for your
benefit; they want to privatize it so they can control the funding and loot it.
I watched the employees from the suddenly defunct brokerage houses scurrying out
onto the streets of New York and London with their desk contents in cardboard
boxes, and wondered how many of them were long-time secretaries just a few years
from retirement and now realizing that their pension had gone up the spout.
Bankruptcy allows companies to forego paying debts such as private pensions,
something that would have resulted in serious jail time 25 years ago, when
companies weren’t allowed to TOUCH the pension funds, let alone invest them in
dicey stock portfolios. One in three private pensions failed prior to the
ongoing economic meltdown, and that number can only increase. The problem with
private pensions is that they are private, and subject, not only to greed and
criminality, but the usual vagaries of the market, which can lash out and
destroy healthy well run companies as well as all the corporate shells that have
been gutted through free market accounting.
How bad are things right now?
Bonds hit negative interest rates today. That means that market speculators were
so frantic to find something stable to hang onto until the storm passed that
they were willing to pay the government interest on the bonds, rather than the
other way around.
In Moscow, the market stayed open a full hour and a half before it crashed
again. It had lost a staggering 17.5% the day before – the equivalent of the Dow
dropping 1,800 points – and it lost another 13% today. It’s one thing to say it
lost a third of its value in two days, but it really managed to do it in four
hours spread out over a two day period. Well, Russians do everything in a big
way.
And who would have thought that the Bush administration would end up socializing
more of the economy than FDR ever dreamed of? The Feds have sunk well over $300
billion into bailing out the mortgage houses, investment banks, and American
Insurance Group. They flat-out own 80% of AIG, and I wonder if they should
change the name to People’s Insurance Group. Just as a reminder of how it came
to fall from its pinnacles of free market power.
Here’s a stray thought: the government runs AIG as an insurance company,
specializing in medical insurance. It isn’t run on a for-profit basis, and
employees are all civil servants.
I wonder how it would do as a socialized insurance company in competition with
Snake Farms and the Tramplers and so on? Especially – dare I say it? Medical
coverage?
Americans say they don’t want nationalized health. They really believe that
millions of Canadians cling to barbed wire all along the US border, looking out
like Auschwitz inmates, all because Canada has public health. But they’ll hold
still for single-payer. One insurance company, one set of forms, consistent and
non-profit-oriented coverage.
Wouldn’t AIG fit the bill now that it’s owned by the government, i.e., us? If
we’re going to bail these undeserving upholstered parasites out, we should get
something back in return.
We’ve got McPander running around sounding like Will Rodgers, talking about the
fat cats and the hard workin’ laborers. It’s funnier than hell to watch, and I
guess he’s gotta do something to distract from the fact that he supported Gramm-Leach-Bliley
and the Commodities Modernization Act, two of the many nasty little bits of
legislation the GOP pushed that led us to our present mess.
But neither McCain nor Obama are doing much other than promising change and an
end to the economic spiral. Nothing is being said about how a lot of the
deregulation that allowed the banksters to run hog-wild and eat their own
children needs to be rolled back immediately, if not sooner, and the massive
monopolies and oligarchies / consortiums that have so corrupted our government
and economy have to be broken up. The guys on wall street don’t like to admit
it, but the economy really does do best when the big companies are broken up
into little companies that must compete, and bankers have to follow rigid – and
conservative – rules.
You can never stop money from influencing and corrupting. As long as humans are
imperfect, that’s going to happen. But you can contain and control it, and keep
it at a level where you don’t have a handful of people robbing the vast majority
of the society blind, and using some of the stolen money to buy media and
legislators who are willing to tell the people they are much better off if they
are poor and let rich people see to their welfare.
I don’t know if we can escape another Great Depression or not. Obviously, you
and I would both be better off if we can. But I remember that it was the Great
Depression, and the loss of power and prestige among the plutocracy, that made
the vast reforms leading to the incredible economic engine of post-war America
possible.
Maybe this time we won’t wait until a third of the population is starving.
|