|
| |
Boumediene vs. Bush
There’s only five loyal Americans left on the Supine Court
© Bryan Zepp Jamieson
http://www.mytown.ca/zepp
6/15/08
Anyone concerned with human rights in the remains of the United States this
week heaved a sigh of relief over the Supreme Court decision Boumediene vs.
Bush, which ruled, once again, that the detainees at Guantánamo are covered by
the ancient principle of habeas corpus, and thus are entitled to their day in
court.
Before the fascist Republican takeover of the Congress and the White House back
in the nineties, the vote would never have been that close. Even with the two
fascists already on the court, Tony Scalia and Slappy Thomas, the vote would
have been 7-2. The bone of contention, after all, was nothing less than deciding
if the accused could have a fair trial or not. Before the Republicans, it was a
bedrock principle in America, usually beyond question. While politicians had
attacked it in the past, usually during times of dire national emergency, such
as the Civil War or World War 2, or in the very earliest days of America when
the new, Constitutional government was still feeling its way (“The Alien and
Sedition Act”), the Courts had always stood firm for habeas corpus.
You can’t really count on that any more. If you take four ultra-right wing
monkeys, dress them in long black robes, call them “judges” and get them on the
Supreme Court, then any right under the American constitution is at risk.
These particular monkeys can’t even keep their crackpot notions of rule over
America consistent. Chief Monkey Justice John Roberts, for instance, called the
majority ruling, “the most generous set of procedural protections ever afforded
aliens detained by this country as enemy combatants.” Aside from the fact that
constitutional rights don’t stem from ANYONE’S generosity, particularly that of
ignorant right wing monkeys, Roberts blew his own previous rationales for
keeping uncharged people locked up indefinitely by calling them “enemy
combatants”. That means they are someone America is at war with, and formal
combatants, and thus, are prisoners of war. That wouldn’t entitle them to
trials, but it WOULD grant them a raft of rights granted specifically to POWs
under the Geneva Convention, which Roberts says doesn’t apply because they
aren’t enemy combatants.
Scalia was playing the usual Republican fear card. He, wrote “the nation will
regret what the Court has done today,” and added, perhaps hopefully, that the
majority ruling “will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.”
This is part and parcel of the GOP stance of ruling through fear. The conceit is
that the rag-tag bunch of disaffecteds in the middle east pose such a grave
threat to the US that the US must get rid of all those rights and freedoms that
America has enjoyed for over 200 years. Creatures like Roberts and Scalia really
believe that the state must have the ability to throw anyone in prison
indefinitely and without trial or sentence in order to preserve freedoms. Such
things as fair trials and determinate sentences will only make the state weak
and incompetent in its ability to fight terrorists, when in fact those freedoms
show that it was the administration was weak and incompetent to start with.
Granted, the current administration is extraordinarily weak and incompetent, but
there are ways other than throwing away habeas corpus to deal with that. Honest
elections, for example. Next time, Scalia, try letting America have an honest
election. Scalia, we shouldn’t have to pay for the fact that you appointed an
incompetent and vicious jackass as president.
And we do pay the same price that the “enemy combatants” do. Only a fool would
think that such draconian measures were ever limited to a class called “enemy
combatants.” Hundreds of the “worst of the worst” America had locked away in
Gitmo have been released because it slowly came to light that those victims
weren’t enemies, weren’t combatants, and in at least a dozen cases, were
actually allied with American troops in Afghanistan! It’s come to light that
when America was shelling out $25,000 for every terrorist turned in by Afghanis
(about ten years’ good pay), quite a few Afghanis hit on a way to get rid of
someone they hated while getting rich at the same time. Quite often – and at
least two dozen of them wound up in Gitmo for five years or more – those turned
in were turned in by neighbors who were angry because they believed those turned
in were collaborating with the Americans! And the admin, anxious to look like it
was “winning the war on terrorism” didn’t inquire into the substance of the
accusations. They simply packed the accused off to Gitmo and crowed about how
many terrorists they had captured.
If ANY of the captives at Gitmo are guilty of crimes, then the admin should
welcome public trials by the normal standards of pre-Republican jurisprudence.
If they are guilty, prove they are guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Then
Americans – and most of the world – would see the incarcerations as legitimate.
But the chance that any of those in Gitmo were actually a danger to the US is
slim to vanishingly small, and the admin, a cowardly pack of liars, knows that.
So do the four GOP hyenas on the Supreme Court. Much better to let innocent
people rot in jail than to curtail the power of a government that is willing to
make freedom march.
The court did uphold habeas corpos, but by only one vote, the thinnest possible
thread. One more right winger, and America is finished, and in the hands of
terrorists; not the Islamic freaks of Afghanistan, but the home grown fascists
of America. And I suspect they would be even worse.
John McCain showed why he must never be president in his response to the
decision. He said, “These are people who are not citizens; they do not and never
have been given the rights that citizens of this country have. There are some
bad people down there.” He called it “one of the worst decisions in the history
of this country:” He went on to make the strange, unfounded claim that “thirty
of the people who have already been released from Guantanamo Bay have already
tried to attack America again.”
To give you some idea of how goofy McCain has gotten, he also warned that the
270 prisoners in Gitmo would “bog down” the entire legal system with petitions
and appeals and the like. As if the several hundred thousand other criminal
cases and appeals going on at the same time don’t.
That’s the McCain stance as he runs for president: there’s no more room at the
inn for any more goddam rights.
Time to turn away from fascism. If the terrorists want to defeat America,
they’ll have to do it from the outside.
|